The two experts have argued that different cultures lead to various attitude to learn. Therefore, it is often indispensable to study with a new method of learning when a student is in another cultural tradition. As we can see, there are four students from foreign countries such as Singapore, Japan, India and Indonesia and they have dissimilar problems to learn. Ballard & Clanchy drew attention foreign learners should change their traditional ways to study like to develop the potential to question, to analyse and to extend critical thinking. In addition, they have claimed that querying is not encouraged in some countries or the teacher teaches all of the knowledge in a variey of educational systems. However, it can not symbolize that students should learn new methods absolutely. This is because I will suggest that the traditional training of education should not be varied completely and students should adjust their attitude properly and learn actively. For instance, in Taiwan and Japan, students are trained to memorise knowledge and calculate effectively. Additionally, it is generally believed that teachers encourage students to ask questions but the learners do not query enthusiastically. In this case, they need more lessons to build up critically skills preparation like thinking, presenting ideas and asking questions. Moreover, students may find out a significant number of information if lectures can provide lots of datas. After that, these learners may be not simply to memorise lots of data as well as they can learn how to find out the main points, make available a thesis statement and think critically.
It can be argued that individual approaches to thinking and writing can be produced by various cultures. “The cultural differences in the nature of rhetoric” is mentioned by Robert Kaplan and he points out the evidence from the analysis of students’ writing to maintain his opinions. According to Kaplan, there is a sub-culture each type of discipline. Therefore, it can be required to write with different pattern in other nations. For instance, a Taiwanese student can not illustrate writing with oriental patter in England, otherwise it may cause some problems like lack of explicit judgement, evaluation and critical opinions. Furthermore, the point of sub-culture can be accepted because it may be an access to develop students’ skills of writing and thinking extensively. Also, studying more than one discipline can be accepted. The more students study, the more they think. For example, the Department of Museum Studies in the University of Leicester, students are from diverse areas like education, history, art, media and biology. Consequently, they may learn different types of discipline when they are taught museum studies.
In conclustions, students should learn a new method of thinking and writing while they study in an English educational environment. According to the essay, learners should adjust their attitude of learning appropriately. Therefore, if a person needs to develop their skills to analyse or think critically, they have to learn to compare various approaches, query and discuss with others. Nevertheless, they should maintain the useful skills like memorising and calculating which are taught in their own nations.
